Legal Opinion
Royal Car Wash Co. v. Mayor and Council of W.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided March 14, 1968PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUILLEN, Judge.
The plaintiff instituted a tort suit against The Mayor and Council of Wilmington (hereinafter referred to as “City”) and Wright Construction Co. (hereinafter referred to as “Wright”) as codefendants.
Wright filed a cross-claim against The City seeking contribution from the City in the event that Wright is found liable to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff contends that it sustained damage to the driveway of its premises located at 201 Philadelphia Pike, Wilmington, Delaware, and loss of business because the driveway was damaged and unusable when on or about March 11, 1966, a water main…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lutz v. BoltzSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
- Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, and Third-Party v. City of Fond Du Lac, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Geiger v. Calumet CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Goldsberry v. Frank Clendaniel, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1954
- Celanese Corp. of America v. Mayor of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Markey v. SkogNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Stephens v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Rodríguez Sosa v. Cervecería India, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1977
- Boyle v. BurtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.