Legal Opinion
Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. v. Banco Popular Del Peru
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 24, 1994No. 93 Civ. 0094 (RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. (“Pravin”) moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., against Banco Popular del Peru (“Banco Popular”) and the Republic of Peru (“Peru”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). Banco Popular and Peru have crossed-moved to dismiss or stay Banker’s motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, the Defendants request that the Court deny Pravin’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that it failed to prove essential elements of its claim and the Court should provide Defendants with adequate time for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. BelmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Cunard Steamship Company Limited v. Salen Reefer Services Ab, United Brands Company, GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Canada Southern Railway Co. v. GebhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. v. Banco Popular Del Peru and the Republic of PeruCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Elliott Associates, L.P. v. Republic of PeruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Basic v. Fitzroy Engineering, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Petition of TamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Petition of KojimaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.