Elliott Associates, L.P. v. Republic of Peru
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Elliott Associates, L.P. (“Elliott”) has moved by order to show cause for writs of prejudgment attachment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 64 and Article 62 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (N.Y. CPLR § 6201 et seq.) against the assets and interests of Defendants Republic of Peru (“Peru”) and Banco de la Nación (“Banco”) (collectively, “Defendants”). For the reasons set forth below, the writs of attachment will be denied.
Parties
Elliott is a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and authorized to do…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Moses v. . McDivittNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sprung v. JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Sullivan v. International Fidelity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- De Sole v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Sylmark Holdings Ltd. v. Silicone Zone International Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 2004
- Elliott Associates, L.P. v. Republic of PeruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Elliott Associates, LP v. the Republic of PeruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- PDVSA US Litigation Trust v. Lukoil Pan Americas, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.