Legal Opinion
Falcon v. Starbucks Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 15, 2008No. Civil Action H-05-0792PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Decertify Collective Action. For the reasons provided below, Defendants’ motion, Docket No. 134, is DENIED.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff Falcon is a former Assistant Store Manager of Defendant Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”). In March 2005, Falcon filed a putative collective action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated pursuant to section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). In his Amended Complaint, (Doc. No. 23), Falcon alleged that Starbucks…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hipp v. Liberty National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Longcrier v. HL-A CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
- Winfield v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- McKnight v. D. Houston, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Zivali v. AT & T MOBILITY, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Prescott v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.