Legal Opinion

Prescott v. Prudential Insurance

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 27, 2010No. Civil 09-322-P-HPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER AND DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTION

D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Michelle Prescott, seeks unpaid wages and other relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 207, 216, and under Maine employment law, 26 M.R.S.A. §§ 664, 670. She asks that her lawsuit be certified conditionally as a collective action under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and that notice issue to other employees accordingly. Her employer, the defendant Prudential Insurance Company (“Prudential”), opposes her request for a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Hipp v. Liberty National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. O'BRIEN v. Ed Donnelly Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Butler v. DirectSAT USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  2. Roy v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. Johnson v. VCG Holding Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
  5. Torrezani v. VIP Auto Detailing, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API