Legal Opinion

Benson Paint & Varnish Co. v. American Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1932No. 5 Div. 100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This is a suit by a matqrialman on a bridge bond to secure a contract with Alabama State Bridge Corporation, and was payable to it.

The question on this appeal is whether this suit should be abated because of the prior pendency of another suit by another materialman on the same bond. Though the question of whether the Gen. Acts of 1927, p. 356 et seq., has application because the contract was with and the bond payable to Alabama State Bridge Corporation was not argued in briefs, the record shows that situation, and the only question on this appeal is controlled by that act, and therefore we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. United States Ex Rel. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. McCarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Providence Engineering Corp. v. Downey Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  5. Stitzer v. United States ex rel. VaughansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Docks Commission v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Magic City Paint & Varnish Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API