Legal Opinion

Providence Engineering Corp. v. Downey Shipbuilding Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 5, 1923No. 43PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The questions which are involved herein arc three:(1) Whether the United States is the real party in interest under the mortgages in the name of the Fleet Corporation.(2) Whether the United States is an indispensable party to the suit.(3) Whether the Fleet Corporation is estopped from asserting that the liens of the mortgages standing in its name are prior to the lien held by the plaintiff.

In considering these questions it becomes important to fix the status of the Fleet Corporation.

It appears that the Act of Congress of September 7, 1916, known as the…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State Docks Commission v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. McMahon v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Kerr v. Enoch Pratt Free LibraryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944
  4. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Rosenberg Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  5. Smith v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API