Legal Opinion
Magic City Paint & Varnish Co. v. American Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 11, 1934No. 5 Div. 151PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The former appeal bore no relation to the merits of the cause, and is without importance here. Benson Paint & Varnish Co. v. American Surety Co., 225 Ala. 353, 142 So. 767. It may be. noted, however, merely for the sake of regularity, that plaintiff’s corporate name has been changed pending the litigation to that of Magic City Paint & Varnish Company.
The suit is against the defendant as surety on the bond of the M. D. Morgan Company, contractor for the construction of a highway bridge near Demopolis.
The M. D. Morgan Company contracted for the construction of a highway bridge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Wadsworth v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeilding Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Foley v. FelrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- D. M. Ferry & Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. JacksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa. v. DevineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Universal Electric Const. Co. of Alabama v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- A.G. Gaston Const. Co., Inc. v. HicksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Cochran Plastering Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.