Flournoy & Epping v. Rutledge
Supreme Court of Georgia
Garnishment. Parties. Principar and Agent. Process. Waiver. Before Judge Willis. Muscogee Superior Court. May Term, 1884. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
On the 14th day of January, 1884, plaintiffs in error, Flournoy <fc Epping, caused a.n attachment to issue in their favor for the sum of $260.75 against W. T. Rutledge, and had the same"-levied by service of summons of garnishment on the Merchants’ Insurance Company, of Newark, on the Insurance Ooriipany of North America, on the Western Assurance Company, andón the Orescent Insurance Company. -,
On the 7th day of March, 1884-, D. F. Wilcox, agent, filed their four separate answers, one i£>r each of the above named companies, admitting an indebtedness on the part of each…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dozier v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Mayer & Lowenstein v. Chattahoochee National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
3Cited by9 opinions
- L. C. Jones Trucking Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Burnett & Goodman v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Warlick v. Neal Loan & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Citizens National Bank v. Swift Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- District of Columbia v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.