Legal Opinion

Citizens National Bank v. Swift Fertilizer Works

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 29, 1915No. 6146PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Garnishment; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Eeid. October 14, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. In cases where the court has no jurisdiction, territorial or otherwise, of the subject-matter, or where there is no legal subject-matter, jurisdiction can not be waived, but in all other instances appearance and pleading, without a reservation by the pleader of his right to object later, are a waiver of all irregularities in the process, or of the absence of process, or of void process, and of the service thereof. See Civil Code, § 5559; Pool v. Perdue, 44 Ga. 454; Carter v. Smith, 5 Ga. App. 804 (63 S. E. 932); Connor v. Hodges, 7 Ga. App. 153 (2) (66 S. E. 546); Saffold v. Foster, 74 Ga.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Neal-Millard Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Savannah, Florida & Western Rwy. Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Pless & SladeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Connor v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Pool v. PerdueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mullis v. McCookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Cherry v. McCutchenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Gammage v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Donaldson v. Tripod Paint Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Nichols v. AcreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API