Legal Opinion

Warlick v. Neal Loan & Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 12, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion to set aside judgment. Before Judge Reid. City court of Atlanta. January 4, 1904.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

On December 7, 1903, there came on to be tried in the city court of Atlanta a case in which C. D. Warlick and others were plaintiffs, and L. D. & A. C. Morris, a partnership, was the defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, and judgment was entered accordingly. There then came on to be heard another case, which was a garnishment proceeding against the Neal Loan and Banking Company, as garnishee, instituted by the plaintiffs in aid of the case first above referred to. The garnishment case was disposed of on the following day by the entering of a judgment against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Holbrook & Co. v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Flournoy & Epping v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Williams v. O'NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Phillips v. H. K. Thurber & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morris Plan Bank of Georgia v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Leffler & Son v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Anderson v. Ashford & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. In re EidsonDistrict Court, D. Georgia · 1980
  5. Columbus Fertilizer Corp. v. International Agricultural Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API