Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,404 First Heritage Corporation v. Prescott, Ball & Turben
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 12, 1983No. 81-1583PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILLMAN, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a denial without prejudice of a stay pending arbitration in a securities action alleging common law fraud and violations of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. Plaintiff-appellee, First Heritage, filed a class action complaint alleging fraud and misrepresentation on the part of defendant-appellant, Prescott, Ball & Turben (PBT) and defendant Oppenheimer & Co.1 arising from plaintiff’s purchase of certain stocks from defendants. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,861 Gerald Mansbach v. Prescott, Ball & TurbenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dale S. COENEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. W. PRESSPRICH & CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Stirling Homex Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilcox v. Ho-Wing SitDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,507 John R. Liskey, Cross-Appellant v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., and Warren K. Hayes, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Levendag v. ChurchillDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
- N. Donald & Co. v. American United Energy Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,404 First Heritage Corporation v. Prescott, Ball & TurbenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983