Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. Ho-Wing Sit
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 3, 1984No. C-84-0615-WWSPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs John and Susan Wilcox, limited partners in Express Fund, Ltd. (“Express, Ltd.”), bring this action under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), and various state law provisions against defendants Ho-Wing Sit and Express Fund of Chicago, Inc. (“Express, Inc.”), limited and general partners respectively of Express, Ltd. The gravamen of plaintiffs’ complaint is that they were fraudulently induced by defendants to sell stock and invest the proceeds in Express, Ltd.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Alfaro v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Smoky Greenhaw Cotton Co., Inc., and John C. Greenhaw, Cross-Appellees v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Zechman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.