Legal Opinion

In re Leslie Arnold Thompson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2018No. 18-BG-508PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility concurred with the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee's findings that respondent Leslie Arnold Thompson had violated Rule 8.4 (d) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2 (b)(3) because he "delayed in responding to Disciplinary Counsel's inquiry letter regarding a disciplinary complaint, failed to respond to a subpoena duces tecum for his client file and his financial records, and failed to comply with a [c]ourt order compelling him to respond to Disciplinary Counsel's subpoena." The Board also agreed that respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re VieheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re KrasovskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
  2. In re Timothy D. NaegeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. In re William F. BurtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API