Legal Opinion

Schwarz v. Bank of Pittsburgh National Ass'n

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1925No. Appeal, 125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Schwarz, plaintiff, a resident of New York, conducted a collection agency in the City of Pittsburgh. He appointed an agent to carry on his business in the latter place, and, by written paper, authorized “Benjamin Leder to sign checks for the withdrawal of funds from [his] account, and to endorse checks for deposit with the Bank of Pittsburgh N. A. upon the above signature.” As agent, several checks were drawn by Leder, and deposited under the power of attorney given. He later became short in his accounts, and temporarily concealed this fact by “kiting” from a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. Central National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. McNeely Co. v. Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Central Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Marks v. Anchor Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Henry W. Horst Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Stierheim v. Bechtold Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Georges Township School District CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. Globe Indemnity Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API