Stierheim v. Bechtold Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ross, J.,
This is a sci. fa. sur mechanic’s lien for $1500.00, the balance due on a building contract. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $500.00. Motions for a new trial and judgment n. o. v. were presented by both the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff’s motion for judgment n. o. v. for the full amount of his claim, $1500.00, was granted, judgment entered thereon, and this appeal followed.
By agreement dated October 18,1940, approximately six months after the filing of the lien, the parties agreed that the defendants were to deposit $2,671.09, the amount of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. FenlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
- Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Harrity v. Continental-Equitable Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Kennedy v. PoorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quinn Construction, Inc. v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Santore v. Reading Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Citizens Trust Co. v. Metzger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1951
- Handwerk v. Bortz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1958
- Melcher v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1955