Rightmire v. Sweat
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
On the 21st day of January, 1954, appellee Cleo Sweat, an unmarried woman, was delivered of a female child. Under the authority of section 12-631, A.R.S. (formerly section 27-402, A.C.A.1939), she brought this action to establish the parentage of the child, alleging that Thomas D. Rightmire, appellant, was the father. Trial was duly had and the jury found that appellant is the father of the child. From the judgment entered on the verdict this appeal has been perfected.
Appellant urges that there was no competent evidence upon which the jury could have based a finding that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Singh v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Dazey v. DazeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Shatford v. ShatfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Faltin v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Whittemore v. AmatorArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Herman v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Inch v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Patrick v. ASSOCIATED DRY. CORP.(GOLDWATER'S DIV.)Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.