Commonwealth v. McClintock
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The defendant was charged with maintaining a lottery. Trial by jury being waived, he was tried before a judge of the Superior Court upon an agreed statement of facts, and found guilty.
The defendant operated a slot machine containing rolls of mints. On its front were the words, “Mints of Quality For 5c. you receive a package of all quality mints and premium checks.” On the face of the machine between the words “and premium” there was a “recess in which any number from 'No’ to '20’ in denominations of two would appear.” When a five cent coin was dropped in the slot at the top of the machine and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- State v. McTeerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Commonwealth v. MackayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Cagle v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Harris v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Dorman, Et Vir. v. Publix-Saenger-Sparks Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Commonwealth v. PlissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Commonwealth v. WolbarstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.