Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McClintock

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 22, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The defendant was charged with maintaining a lottery. Trial by jury being waived, he was tried before a judge of the Superior Court upon an agreed statement of facts, and found guilty.

The defendant operated a slot machine containing rolls of mints. On its front were the words, “Mints of Quality For 5c. you receive a package of all quality mints and premium checks.” On the face of the machine between the words “and premium” there was a “recess in which any number from 'No’ to '20’ in denominations of two would appear.” When a five cent coin was dropped in the slot at the top of the machine and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. State v. McTeerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Commonwealth v. MackayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Cagle v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Harris v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Dorman, Et Vir. v. Publix-Saenger-Sparks Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Commonwealth v. PlissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Commonwealth v. WolbarstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API