Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Wolbarst
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 6, 1946PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The defendant has been found guilty, after a trial by a judge without a jury, of violating an ordinance of Cambridge which prohibits any person from having in his possession and control in any restaurant, public hall, store, place of amusement or any other place to which the public may resort, or installing or permitting to be installed in any such place, a pin ball machine, “marble games, diggers, grab machines, baseball or football machine games, target machines, horse racing machines, or any other device by whatever name such device may from time to time be known which by the insertion of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Commonwealth v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Cox v. SegeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Commonwealth v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Commonwealth v. SurridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Revere v. AucellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Atherton v. Selectmen of BourneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Planning Board v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Abdow v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Gillam v. Board of Health of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.