Legal Opinion

Harris v. Missouri Gaming Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 22, 1994No. 76123PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Judge.

On April 28, 1993, the General Assembly enacted S.B. 10 & 11 “relating to the regulation of certain gaming activities” (the “Act”). Previously at the general election on November 3, 1992, the People approved a referendum law H.B. 149 “relating to certain gaming activities.” 1 The General Assembly, howev er, in its Act repealed almost all of H.B. 149. The Act created a Gaming Commission to regulate riverboat gambling — previously done by the Tourism Commission under H.B. 149. § 313.004. RSMo Supp.1998. 2 The Act also deleted H.B. 149’s non-severability clause, and H.B. 149’s…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. HudsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Eastern Missouri Laborers District Council v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Doe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Crow Tribe of Indians v. RacicotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Missouri Coalition for the Environment v. Joint Committee on Administrative RulesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. State v. RousseauMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Board of Education v. Missouri State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API