Legal Opinion

Cagle v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1922No. 8 Div. 988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The following is a sufficient statement of facts:

“I went into his place of business and found a slot machine in said place, and I played this machine. This slot machine had on it a chewing gum device; it had a slot, and was operated with two levers. It also had on it an indicator. There was gum in the gum device. The machine was operated in the following manner, and I operated it in such manner, to wit: In the slot of the machine I dropped a nickel. Before dropping the nickel, I saw that the indicator showed that I would receive gum. After dropping nickel in the slot I pulled the lever on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barber v. Jefferson County Racing Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. McClintockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. State v. KraussOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Marvin v. SloanMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. United States v. Johnnie WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API