Legal Opinion

Martinez v. De Los Rios

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1960No. Civ. 6350PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an appeal from an order after final judgment denying appellant’s motion for entry of full satisfaction of judgment. The facts as shown by the record before us are as follows: Appellant and respondents on this appeal are all defendants in the above entitled action. Judgment was rendered against all of them for damages on account of their tortious trespass on, conversion of ore from, and injury to certain mining property owned by plaintiff Martinez. (See Martinez v. De Los Rios, 165 Cal.App.2d 102 [331 P.2d 724], for greater detail.)

In the complaint appellant and respondents herein were…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Adams v. White Bus LineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
  2. Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Luth, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  3. Bartneck v. DunkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. B.B. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Robert Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Thomas Luth And Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P./Robert Hageman, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API