Legal Opinion
Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Luth
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided June 24, 2004No. 03-03-00081-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.
We grant the motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion and judgment issued on February 20, 2004, and substitute this one to address the questions of venue and exemplary damages raised in the motion for rehearing. 1 We conclude that no error is reflected in the transfer of venue and that appellees did not preserve the issue of exemplary damages.
In this case, we consider the proper characterization of a debt discharged in bankruptcy, the continuing viability of the rule that the assignment of a judgment to one of the judgment debtors extinguishes the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Fleming Foods of Texas, Inc. v. RylanderTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- US Bank, N.A. v. Prestige Ford Garland Ltd. Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Texas Department of Transportation v. Malcolm G. Dyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
- Colonial American Casualty & Surety Co. v. Scherer, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Ramsay v. Camrac, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Chemical Lime, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.