Legal Opinion
Robert Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Thomas Luth And Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P./Robert Hageman
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided February 20, 2004No. 03-03-00081-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-03-00081-CV
Robert Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P., Appellants
v.
Thomas Luth; and Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P./Robert Hageman, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 01-626-C368, HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING
O P I N I O N
In this case, we consider the proper characterization of a debt discharged in bankruptcy, the continuing viability of the rule that the assignment of a judgment to one of the judgment debtors extinguishes the judgment for all judgment…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Fleming Foods of Texas, Inc. v. RylanderTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.