Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance v. Frank
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 26, 2020No. 2ag/19PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. David Elliott Frank, Misc. Docket AG No. 2, September Term 2019. Opinion by Hotten, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – DISBARMENT – The Court of Appeals disbarred David Elliott Frank from the practice of law in Maryland. The Court found that Respondent violated MARPC 19-301.1 (Competence), 19-301.15 (Safekeeping Property), 19-308.1 (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), 19-308.4 (Misconduct), 19-404 (Trust Account – Required Deposits), 19-408 (Commingling of Funds), and 19-410 (Prohibited Transactions) and Md. Code. Ann., Business Occupations…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. VasiliadesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.