Legal Opinion

Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1973No. Appeal, 93PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

Chauncey and Anne Thompson purchased a heating system from Sears, Roebuck and Company (“Sears”) in August 1957. Sears contracted with the Superior Heating Company (“Superior”) to install the system. After installation, a fire destroyed the Thompson home.

The Thompsons sued Sears and recovered $20,000. Sears paid the judgment and proceeded against Superi- or for the amount of the judgment plus costs and legal fees associated with its defense of the Thompson claim. Superior is insured by the Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”). Pursuant to its policy,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Taylor v. Haverford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. McWilliams v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Ladner v. SiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Sterrett's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Ass'n v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Vale Chemical Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. S. G. S. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education & the Hospital Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API