Legal Opinion
Vale Chemical Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 1986No. 138; 139PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Justice.
Transamerica Insurance Company (“Transamerica”) and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (“Hartford”) appeal by allowance a Superior Court order which affirmed the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County in this declaratory judgment action. Common Pleas held that both appellants had issued liability policies whose coverage required them to provide appellee both defense and indemnifi*292cation for an Illinois plaintiffs products liability action in Illinois. Plaintiff brought that action for cancer which she claimed to suffer as a result of appellee’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Wiest v. Mt. Lebanon School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Keystone Insurance v. Warehousing & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Johnson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Federal Kemper Insurance Company v. Rauscher, Richard H. And Griffith, Robert and Griffith, Linda. Appeal of Robert and Linda GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- J.H. France Refractories Co. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- General Refractories Co. v. First State InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Treesdale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.