Legal Opinion

Connell v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 23, 1930No. 12,514PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

This is a companion case to Continental Casualty Co. v. Connell, et al., 87 Colo. 577, 290 Pac. 273, just decided.

The Industrial Commission granted compensation in favor of Cunningham as against Connell and the Casualty Company. The Casualty Company sought a review by the district court, making Cunningham and the commission defendants. Though served with a summons, Connell failed to appear, and his default was entered. A hearing was had, and the district court held that the insurance policy issued to Connell by the Casualty Company did not cover the injury to Cunningham and that the Casualty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. ConnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  2. Redeker v. Denver Music Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dudley v. KellerColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Ehrlinger v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. Kamp v. DisneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Browning v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  5. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. BatisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API