Legal Opinion

Browning v. Potter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 24, 1954No. 17120PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

On March 7, 1952 Delos D. Potter, defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as Potter, filed his complaint under Rule 105 R.C.P. Colo, against fifty-one defendants, in addition to “unknown parties,” seeking a decree to adjudicate the rights and interests of all parties in and to certain unpatented mining locations and to quiet Potter’s title thereto. Potter alleged that he was the sole owner of said claims, subject only to the title of the United States.

Among the defendants in said action were Carl C. Browning, Carl C. Browning as executor of the estate of William C. Browning, deceased,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connell v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  2. Self v. WattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  3. Mountain v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  4. Mosco v. JeannotSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Craig v. RiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Borer v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Riss v. Air Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Ehrlinger v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  5. Mauro v. TracySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API