Legal Opinion
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Batis
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 30, 1947No. 15,867PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays
George Batís, a coal miner, under circumstances, pres ently to be stated., was awarded compensation by the Industrial Commission oí -Colorado against the Union Coal Operating Company, a copartnership, the employer, and State Compensation Insurance Fund, the insurer, for injuries received to his left arm and left eye as a result of an automobile accident occurring while he was going to work. Being dissatisfied with the award, the State Fund and Coal Company instituted an appropriate action in the district court under the provisions of section 378, chapter 97, ’35 C.S.A., against Batis, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cox's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Industrial Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Comstock v. BivensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- O. P. Skaggs Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Index Mines Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vanadium Corporation of America v. SargentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Industrial Commission v. LavachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Curry v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Evergreen Investment & Realty Co. v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. DeanColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.