Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Connell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 23, 1930No. 12,536PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

This is a workmen’s compensation case. James D. Connell was engaged in the automobile business in Denver. He employed Frank Cunningham, a carpenter, to construct a cabin for him at Indian Hills, a mountain resort some distance from Denver. While engaged in constructing the cabin, Cunningham was injured. Connell carried insurance with the Continental Casualty Cbm pany. The insurance policy covered only injuries to “in-servants” at Connell’s residence, No. 665 Marion street, Denver. It did not cover injuries to those constructing the cabin at Indian Hills. The commission entered an order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Connell v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Connell v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API