Legal Opinion
State v. Sap
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1987No. C6-86-1747PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant Chan Sap was convicted of fleeing a police officer, Minn.Stat. § 609.-487 (1984). He claims he was denied a speedy trial, a hearing to challenge the jury panel, a fair trial because of improper jury instructions, and he also contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of fleeing a police officer. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 11, 1985, around 11:00 p.m. St. Paul police officers observed a parked car on fire on Otsego. A person stepped out from the front of the car, and walked over to a 1985 Camaro parked on the opposite side of the street. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. HelenboltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. CoraritoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. GivensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ChamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Rahr Malting Co. v. County of ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. ShepardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990