Legal Opinion

State v. Hines

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1990No. C9-90-29Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant Wilfred James Hines was convicted of unlawfully possessing cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.15, subd. 1(2) (1988). On appeal he challenges admission of the statements of his alleged co-conspirator, “Bogie” or Donald James Bogenreif; his trial attorney’s failure to withdraw so that he could provide testimony which appellant claims was crucial to his defense; and the trial court’s instruction to the jury on reasonable doubt. We affirm.

FACTS

On May 19, 1989, a confidential reliable informant told Michael Isaac he had given Isaac’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. State v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API