Legal Opinion
State v. Shepard
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 2, 1991No. C8-90-2287PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to support a verdict of driving while under the influence of alcohol. The jury acquitted her of driving with an alcohol concentration of .10 or more, but found her guilty of careless driving and driving under the influence of alcohol. We find the evidence insufficient to support her conviction of driving while under the influence and reverse.
FACTS
On November 19, 1989, appellant Leona Faye Shepard and her husband drove their truck to a laundromat in Pine River. Shepard’s father-in-law, who was at the Shepard home all day,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. Alexander GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State v. LangleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. DodisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ShepardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992