Legal Opinion

Rahr Malting Co. v. County of Scott

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 2, 2001No. CX-00-1676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Through a petition for a writ of prohibition, Rahr Malting Company (Rahr) asks this court to prohibit the Minnesota Tax Court from holding a public trial in its appeal of a tax valuation of its malting facility. The tax court denied Rahr’s motion to close portions of the trial to the public and to seal portions of the record to protect certain proprietary information. Rahr claims that, if the tax court does not protect the privacy of its proprietary information and the information becomes available to its competitors and customers, the disclosure will have a devastating…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Erickson v. MacArthurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Syrovatka v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Prairie Island Indian Community v. Minnesota Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  4. In re PooleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  5. State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API