Legal Opinion
Stoneburner v. Richfield Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1931No. Docket No. 563PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREEMAN, J., pro tem.
On the thirteenth day of August, 1929, Belle Stoneburner was a passenger in an automobile driven by Mrs. Odessa Hendee westerly along the Valley Boulevard, a public highway connecting the cities of Los Angeles and San Bernardino. At a point about eight miles westerly of the town of Bloomington, the Hendee car came into collision with a light automobile driven by am unknown person. Mrs. Stoneburner was seriously injured in the collision and brought this action against the defendants to recover damages.
It appears from the record before us that a truck and trailer equipped…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. MaughsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Hirshberg v. StraussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Chambers v. FarnhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Fennessey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Strandt v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Simmons v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.