Annin v. Belridge Oil Employees Federal Credit Union
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff Annin from an order of the municipal court granting to defendants a new trial after judgment in the municipal court for the plaintiff. The defendant-respondent did not take a cross-appeal from the judgment as permitted by rule 3(a) (2) of the Buies on Appeal from Municipal Courts in Civil Cases.
The plaintiff’s cause of action as disclosed by his complaint was to recover a payment in the sum of $571.41 made by him to the defendant Belridge Oil Employees Federal Credit Union by mistake, in the belief that he had signed a note payable to the credit union, whereas…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Scott v. RenzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Reusche v. California Pacific Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Cal. State Auto. Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Barrett Garages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Estate of BuzzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Willis v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.