Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Caroline Mills, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1948No. 12179PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

This is another of those dreary reviews of Board proceedings presenting the question not whether the findings of fact made by the Board, as trier of the facts, on evidence presented by the Board, as prosecutor, in support of charges filed by the Board, as complainant, have been fairly, impartially, and justly arrived at, but whether they are “supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole”. It presents the usual picture of supporting findings arrived at by a process of quite uniformly “auditing” testimony favorable to the charges and as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southport Petroleum Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Athens Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Southport Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Grace Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Ray Smith Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Camera CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. Pittsburgh S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API