Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Ray Smith Transport Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1951No. 13612PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
Exonerating the trial examiner of specific charges of unfairness and bias, and adopting substantially whole his findings, conclusions and recommendations, the Board found 1 2 Respondent: (1) subject to the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.; (2) in violation of Sec. 8(a) (1), in respect to statements made to and questions asked of its employees; and (3) in violation of Secs. 8(a) (1) and (3), in respect of the discharge of six employees.
Based on these findings, it entered its order requiring respondent to cease and desist, 8 and to take affirmative action. 3
■Respondent not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Birmingham Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Max Lutz and Ruth Lutz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ace Comb Company and Ace Bowling Company, Division of Amerace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Eastern Greyhound Lines, (A Division of the Greyhound Corporation) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.