Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Worley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1925No. 19124. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

This suit involves a redemption from the sale of certain real estate under foreclosure of a mortgage.

In August, 1918, the defendant George B. Worley and Mark Odell and wife mortgaged to White & Bollard, a corporation, certain real estate in Mason county, in this state, to secure a promissory note in the sum of $3,500. About a month later the same parties gave a second mortgage to Louis B. Schmidt to secure a "note for the sum of $3,500. Both mortgages were duly recorded. Sometime thereafter the White & Bollard note came due and they brought suit to foreclose the mortgage which secured it,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hooker v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Cameron v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Tharp v. KerrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Wade v. MajorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Graves v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Burwell & Morford v. Seattle Plumbing Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Kuper v. StojackWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Madison Properties, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API