Schmidt v. Worley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
This suit involves a redemption from the sale of certain real estate under foreclosure of a mortgage.
In August, 1918, the defendant George B. Worley and Mark Odell and wife mortgaged to White & Bollard, a corporation, certain real estate in Mason county, in this state, to secure a promissory note in the sum of $3,500. About a month later the same parties gave a second mortgage to Louis B. Schmidt to secure a "note for the sum of $3,500. Both mortgages were duly recorded. Sometime thereafter the White & Bollard note came due and they brought suit to foreclose the mortgage which secured it,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Hooker v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Cameron v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Tharp v. KerrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Wade v. MajorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Graves v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Burwell & Morford v. Seattle Plumbing Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Kuper v. StojackWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Madison Properties, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.