Burwell & Morford v. Seattle Plumbing Supply Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action to restrain the redemption of real property sold at sheriff’s sale on execution and to quiet its title. After trial to the court, judgment was entered as prayed for by plaintiff.
Defendant Seattle Plumbing Supply Company appeals, and urges that the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to hold that a redemption brought about through the efforts of respondent terminated the effect of the sale and that appellant’s judgment was therefore made a first hen against the property; in holding that the redemption was made by a redemptioner which barred any…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson ex. dem. Merrit v. BowenNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- Hervey v. KrostIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Mobley v. HarkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Horn v. Indianapolis National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Russell v. AllenNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mollerup v. Storage Systems InternationalUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Graves v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A. v. StaufferIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kuper v. StojackWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Syrovy v. Alpine Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.