Enz v. Johns
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE Pro Tem. MoDANIEL Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a personal injury case tried without a jury by the court.
The cause of action arose from an automobile collision which occurred at about 4:30 P. M., June 30, 1929, at the intersection of Twenty-seventh Street and S Street, which streets intersect at right angles, Twenty-seventh Street extending north and south and S Street east and west, in the city of Sacramento, California. Plaintiff and respondent was driving his automobile toward the south on Twenty-seventh Street as he…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Gilmore v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Casselman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Lindenbaum v. BarbourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Muir v. Cheney Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- McDougall v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.