Legal Opinion

Enz v. Johns

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1931No. Docket No. 4162PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE Pro Tem. MoDANIEL Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a personal injury case tried without a jury by the court.

The cause of action arose from an automobile collision which occurred at about 4:30 P. M., June 30, 1929, at the intersection of Twenty-seventh Street and S Street, which streets intersect at right angles, Twenty-seventh Street extending north and south and S Street east and west, in the city of Sacramento, California. Plaintiff and respondent was driving his automobile toward the south on Twenty-seventh Street as he…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Gilmore v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Casselman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Lindenbaum v. BarbourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Muir v. Cheney Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. McDougall v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API