Legal Opinion

McDougall v. Morrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1942No. Civ. 12128PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received when the automobile in which she was riding collided with that driven by the defendant. The ease was tried before the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for plaintiff. From that judgment defendant prosecutes this appeal, his sole contention being that, as a matter of law, the evidence shows that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. A reading of the record demonstrates that, on the basic issues of negligence of defendant, contributory negligence of plaintiff, and proximate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Springer v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Casselman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Neilson v. HouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Uhl v. FertigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. De La Torre v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ArenaHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Terrell v. Key SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Pandell v. HischierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Reed v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Dickison v. LaThorpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API