Bush v. Ruth's Chris Steak House, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
Granting in Part & Denying in Part the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs are former female employees of Ruth’s Chris Steak House who allege that they were subjected to gender discrimination by Defendants, Ruth’s Chris and other related corporate entities. Plaintiffs seek to represent a class of similarly situated women, prosecuting claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”). In December 2011, the court issued an order that bifurcated the class and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Partners v. BlumenthalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Vuyanich v. Republic Nat. Bank of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
- U.S. International Trade Commission v. ASAT, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Wright v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Reed v. Advocate Health CareDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flame S.A. v. Industrial Carriers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Barnwell Enterprises Ltd v. Emerging Capital PartnersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bobba v. PatelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.