Legal Opinion

Reed v. Advocate Health Care

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 28, 2009No. 06 C 3337PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN F. GRADY, District Judge.

Before the court are several motions: (1) plaintiffs’ motion for class certification; (2) defendants’ motion to strike the impact analyses in plaintiffs expert’s declarations; (3) the motion of defendant University of Chicago Hospitals (“UCH”) to strike the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert, as applied to UCH’s nurses; and (4) plaintiffs’ motion to strike the report of UCH’s expert. For the reasons explained below, all of the motions are denied.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Lisa Reed and Cindy Digiannantonio are registered nurses (“RNs”) who allege that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. In re Flonase Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
  4. In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  5. In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API