Legal Opinion
Lindsay v. Jenkins
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1991No. 67A01-9102-CV-27PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Arthur A. Lindsay, Jr. appeals from summary judgment for Morris Jenkins, Delores Jenkins, Ralph Parco, Mary Parco, Robert Rendaci, Terri Rendaci, Joe Rendaci, Mary Rendaci, Larry Skaggs, and Eileen Skaggs {collectively "Jenkins") in an abuse of process action. We reverse and remand.
ISSUES
We restate the issues on appeal as:
1. Did the trial court erroneously grant summary judgment because a genuine issue of material fact exists whether Jenkins had an ulterior motive in filing suit against Lindsay?
2. Is the defense of advice of counsel a defense to abuse…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mullins v. SandersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- DISPLAY FIXTURES CO., ETC. v. RL Hatcher, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Flynn v. SongerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Lawlis v. Kightlinger & GrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Carlton Hart v. Christine ManninaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Golden Years Homestead, Inc. v. BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Crosson v. BerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Reichhart v. City of New HavenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.