Legal Opinion

WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Meeks

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 5, 1970No. 5-5270PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellee brought suit against appellant on a disability insurance policy. From an adverse judgment, appellant seeks reversal, alleging error in refusing to permit cross-examination of appellee concerning his income before and after the accident from which his alleged disability resulted and in procedures in making a drawn and struck jury. We reverse for error in limiting this cross-examination.

Appellee claimed that an injury by gunshot suffered on February 22, 1968, required the amputation of his left foot and caused his total disability as defined in the policy.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Costa v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Cunningham v. Austin & Northwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Uhlman v. Farm, Stock & Home Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Choy v. OtaguroHawaii Supreme Court · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barnett v. Arkansas Transport Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Rickett v. HayesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Haight v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Henry v. LandrethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Parham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API