Rochkind v. Stevenson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Stanley Rochkind v. Starlena Stevenson, No. 47, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Getty, J. EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY—MARYLAND RULE 5-702—SUFFICIENT FACTUAL BASIS—FRYE-REED STANDARD—DAUBERT STANDARD Over four decades ago, the Court of Appeals in Reed v. State,
283 Md. 374
(1978), adopted the “general acceptance” test—first espoused in Frye v. United States,
293 F. 1013
(D.C. Cir. 1923)—for the admissibility of expert testimony based on new or novel scientific principles. In 1993, the Supreme Court of the United States, in adopting a new “reliability” standard for admissibility of expert testimony…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Abruquah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Leidig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Frankel v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.