Legal Opinion

United States v. Markey

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 29, 2004No. 04-2044PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.

Defendanb-Appellant Kenneth Randall Markey pleaded guilty to a one-count indictment for being a felon in possession of explosives in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 842(f)(1). As a condition to entering the plea, Mr. Markey reserved the right to appeal the District Court’s order precluding him from presenting evidence that the dynamite he possessed could not actually explode. We take jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

In December 2002, Mr. Markey was given four sticks of dynamite by an acquaintance who had found the sticks in a commercial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. Mesa RithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. CappsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. DeChristopherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Rivas-MaciasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. MontelongoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Duarte v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2005
  5. United States v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API