Legal Opinion

United States v. Capps

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1996No. 95-3083PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

At his trial for violating the “felon-in-possession” statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), Michael Capps stipulated that 1) he was previously convicted of two federal felonies; 2) he was in possession of a functioning firearm; and 3) the firearm was not manufactured in Kansas. Though acknowledging that these stipulations facially satisfied the government’s case in chief, Capps offered as a defense his good faith and reasonable belief that, because his civil rights were restored under Kansas law, the federal convictions did not count as predicate felonies and, therefore,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Beecham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. United States v. McKissickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. United States v. Coyette Deon JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. John R. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API